2nd Sunday in Ordinary Time / A January 15, 2017

Being a Light in the World

Today’s readings point out four people who were lights in the world.

Being a Light in the World is a theme of Jesus, but he gets it from today’s passage from Isaiah. “It is too little, says the Lord, for you to … raise up the tribes of Jacob and restore the survivors of Israel; I will make you a light to the nations that my salvation shall reach the ends of the earth.” (Isaiah 49: 3, 5-6) To understand the hope of our faith, we need to understand the lives of those who suffer. The leadership of Israel has been exiled, without land, wealth, or power. Their identity as a people is on the verge of being lost. Yet the Lord tells the prophet that he will not only be the one to restore the survivors to the homeland, but that he will also be a light to the nations to the ends of the earth.

John the Baptist was a light in the wilderness. People streamed to the River Jordan to hear his words, repent, and be baptized. Even Jesus went to him, was influenced by him and was baptized. John was important, but when John laid his eyes upon Jesus, he recognized Jesus as the Light sent by the Father to save the world.

Jesus’ ultimate mission was to shape his followers or apostles to be lights in the world. These apostles, which mean those who were sent, were a mixed bag including doubters, deniers, and betrayers. Yet these lights, with the help of the resurrected Jesus, would convert a hard-hearted Pharisee named Saul (Paul).

Paul called himself, “an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God.” Paul’s mission was filled with controversy: conversion of Jews, Greeks, Romans, and the communities he was writing to. This did not always sit well with the others like Barnabas, John Mark, Peter, James, and the leaders of the Church. Sometimes he called the church and other apostles beyond themselves, and sometimes they reined him in. That being said, he made the effort to go out into the world and to spread the unifying message of Christ’s love. Paul, in Corinthians, calls us the “Body of Christ.” I think this means that we are to be a source of God’s light in the world. Jesus tells us that that lights (or lamps) are to be placed on a stand for all can see. Unfortunately, many of us put our lights under a bushel basket so that only those inside the basket can see our light.

We must work like Isaiah, Paul, and John the Baptist to embody the love and light of (God) Christ in our lives. Letting our light shine is using our talents and love for the betterment of others, the world, the sick, the injured and the poor. It is not really hard, but it does take a conscious effort. Much is accomplished in making the effort. Much is lost when we don’t.

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Reflection:25th Sunday Ordinary Time

Amos 8:4-7
1 Timothy 2:1-8
Luke 16:10-13

The world yearns for a moral voice, but other voices seem to drown it out. We intrinsically know right from wrong, but we ignore that inner voice because it works for our benefit.

Working after college, I listed my priorities in this order: God, family, friends, myself, career, making money, etc. But comparing that to how I was living, my world revolved around my job as a restaurant manager working almost 60 hours/week, getting one weekend off a month, and working 6 days every fourth week. Like most of us, my income was important, but did it have to rule my life?
Pat Buchanan on the last show of the McLaughlin Group said that the Catholic Church is growing in the South, but declining in the North. At the same time, the North is paying for the Church’s mission throughout the world. Pope Francis favors an Argentinian socialist system that does not work. Francis is no John Paul (paraphrased from memory). Buchanan seems to believe that those who pay for things should call the shots. Francis seems to think that the poor need to be heard and maybe sometimes they should call the shots.
The tension between the wealthy, the powerful, and the poor in religion goes back to the enslavement in Egypt and to the time of Amos. Upon entering the Promised Land, safeguards were installed in Israel to benefit the poor. Amos is concerned, disheartened, and angry that these safeguards are being discarded for the sake of profit. Festivals that by law reorder the status of the people are discarded the moment the festival ends.
Jesus takes a different approach in seeing the same things as Amos. He describes a scene in the way the world works. He holds a mirror up for us to look at ourselves in how we make plans for our benefit. Then he puts us in a dual role of the one in charge and the one who is conniving. We see all as God sees all. Jesus relates to us about being trustworthy in the small unimportant things, because it reflects on our actions with the important things.
To be honest with ourselves, Jesus is pointing to our inmost fears. Money, wealth, power protect us from some of those fears: poverty, homelessness, violence, exploitation, slavery, dependency, difficulties, etc.
Jesus tries to raise our insights into discovering the “Kingdom of God” in our midst and that God loves us as his own creation. But since the “Kingdom of God” is elusive, the dependency of money is tempting. Whether or not money is at the root of all evil, we still have to eat, take care of our housing, and all the other needs that we worry about. Still whom do we ultimately serve: God or money?
Paul asks us to pray for our leaders and our society. It seems so important today, with elections that affect our country and our state. I personally am attending a number of families of people dead from senseless violence, families finding safe and dependable schools, and others looking for any kind of job. Since our poor have been neglected for so long, their growing problems are bringing fear to the rest of our country and even our world. So our elected leaders need to address these problems with wisdom and compassion.
The poor are crying out as they were in the time of Amos and the time of Jesus. The readings tell us to care. Our fears tell us not to act.
So we yearn for a moral voice….

–Brother Jim Fogarty, BSL


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Police Trust: Taking a Long View- Part II


During the summer of 1985, I was a seminarian working with street gangs at St. Malachy Church adjacent to the old Henry Horner housing projects.  One day a family came to see me.  A teenage gang member had been arrested for a crime, but the officers had humiliated him in public.  I drove the family to the police station.

At the station, the Police Captain met with me, the gang member, his mother, two witnesses, and the two police officers in a room.  For about a half hour all sides talked and an agreement was worked out that the charges would be dropped against the gang member and the actions by the police officers would be forgiven.  The only words I spoke were to the gang member and his mother, “Is this agreeable to you?” They wholeheartedly agreed. I was relieved. Once we got into the car, I was surprised everyone started cursing and said that they were going to get those officers.  Later they asked me if I knew a lawyer to sue the officers and the department.  I realized that being with gang members and their families was going to be complicated.

Twenty years later, in the summer of 2005, I was walking in the Dearborn Homes.  I was looking for information concerning a funeral.  The neighborhood was quiet.  Women told me to be careful because the police were locking people up for trespassing.  While I was writing down the funeral information, I was surrounded by the gang tactical unit of the Chicago Police.  Jerome Finnegan, head of the unit, began bullying, threatening, and intimidating me.  He asked me for my driver’s license and my Catholic Charities ID.  The remaining officers tacitly agreed with Officer Finnegan.  I had a choice to force an arrest or to back down and leave. I left.

Officer Finnegan was recognized for his courage and valor by the Chicago Police Department.  He was considered heroic until he was disgraced and imprisoned for hiring a man to kill a fellow officer who challenged his actions.  Since then, Officer Finnegan’s misdeeds have been a humiliation for the Chicago Police department.  However, many police officers were aware of his actions and instead of reprimanding him, he was promoted and seen as an answer to the problem of gangs.

Generally, the police and gang members hate each other.  They both want to be left alone by the rest of society so that they can do what they want.  Police are taught to shoot to kill.  Gang members know this so they must have a way out in a direct confrontation, or else surrender, be injured, or die.  If they cannot find an escape they will lose.

Gangs are conducting illegal activities and are heavily armed.  In the past 10 years I have known two teenagers murdered for selling drugs on their own, with nobody backing them up and not being armed.  Hustling drugs was the easiest way for them to make money.  One cannot sell drugs in gang neighborhoods without being armed.

The conflicts between the police and gang members are real and dangerous for both sides. Some police officers are known to be fair and trustworthy.  They have proven themselves to do their jobs without adding bogus charges, beating arrestees, and by listening to complaints.  They are able to see the problems in gang neighborhoods and are uncomfortable with regular police tactics.  Yet they do not feel that their suggestions are heard.

These officers, with years of street experience, are the ones who are best able to lead the efforts for reform.  The main problems, as I see it, are if reforms are made then many officers and the police union will resist the changes.  Second, because the situations are difficult, when reforms lead to mistakes or when something bad happens to the police officers things will go back to the way things have always been.  Protests will continue and people will get hurt.

–Brother Jim Fogarty





Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Police Trust: Taking A Long View- Part I

During my freshman year, my team, made up from White kids, was playing a Black team at our community college.  Despite our lockers being separated by team, I ended up alone in part of the locker room with an opponent.  While I was tying my shoes one of my teammates came over worried that I was surrounded by black players.  Racial fears were felt, even by college kids playing an intramural basketball game.

The 1960’s and 70’s were a missed opportunity for our country.  The Black community was divided into three overlapping camps:  Those who believed in non-violent direct action for their rights (this lost its focus with the death of Dr. King), the Black Power Movement that was militant and demanding, and a third group who hoped that the change in laws would improve racial relations.

At the same time the White community was also divided into three camps:  The White racists, the White liberals who tried to be color blind including those with White Guilt, and a third group who hoped things would get better, but avoided crossing racial boundaries.

Three problems occurred: White folks were afraid of Black Power and Black people, White folks wanted Black equality without sacrificing their White privilege, and there was resentment across racial lines.

Resentment, poverty, and exclusion have placed a wedge between poor Blacks and the rest of the country. It is easy to see that large public housing complexes (99% Black) in big cities like Chicago developed a culture that led to underground illegal economies that brought drugs, guns, and killing to certain neighborhoods.  Yet the racial tensions are felt in every corner of our country.

Blacks are over-represented in our jails and prisons, but at the same time violence and murders are over-represented in their communities.  These Black youth are dropping out of school in alarming rates, but where do they see a high school diploma leading directly to anything?

Law enforcement has been the main player in attacking the problems in these streets.  They have not had much success.  They face the pressure of making arrests and stopping crime in an uncooperative community.  Cooperating with the police damages the economic and social relationships of the neighborhoods, causing danger, isolation, and vengeance to the cooperators.

For the past 400 years law enforcement and poor Blacks have been at war with each other.    Poor Blacks have, for the most part, worked at deception to avoid interaction with the police whenever possible. For most of this time these conflicts have been racial, but in my thirty years of working with gangs Black Officers are not liked either.

Police officers and gang members have one thing in common.  They both look out for their own at the expense of the other.  While it is a crime to lie to or deceive law enforcement,  it is a badge of honor to lie to or deceive a suspect.  While a police officer will seldom suffer criminal penalties for homicide or brutality of a Black suspect, a Black man will face prison time for defending himself from a brutal attack from a police officer.   The anger is never alleviated.

With the acquittals of officers Rice, Goodson, and Nero of all charges in the death of Freddie Gray, in Baltimore, the Fraternal Order of Police said, “If (the prosecutor’s) office is willing to violate rules in these high profile cases, we can only imagine what her office is doing in the cases that affect the citizens of Baltimore every day…”  For the cases that affect the poor Black community, which is large in Baltimore, “Did Freddie Gray’s life matter?”

(This is part I of a continuing series. Please check back soon for Part II as Brother Jim continues to explore the complexity of the police-Black poor relationship)

–Brother Jim Fogarty, Brothers and Sisters of Love


Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Confessions of an Intentional Neighbor

About five years ago, I watched a young blonde woman walk her white poodle down the pristine sidewalk, headphones helping her tune out the world, business casual dress.  It was the ultimate view of an up-and-coming suburban woman navigating the post-college business world. Why was this scene memorable?  Because I watched from Brother Jim’s car as we were a few blocks away from reaching our destination—the Cabrini Green rowhouses.  Thanks to gentrification, an area whose streets have soaked in blood and whose air wafted of the drug trade now housed trendy loft apartments for the young and powerful.  And the world had become so segregated that mere blocks meant drastically different lived experiences, with no threat of interaction.

I have a confession to make. I have become that woman.

No, I have not gone so far off the deep end that I own a poodle, but nevertheless I have become the white woman stroller in front and socially-conscious-rescue-dog behind, walking through a neighborhood whose history does not belong to me.

Similar to Chicago, urban planners of Richmond, Virginia came up with a way to concentrate the poor and bottleneck their mobility so as to forget about them.  Crime rates skyrocketed within these blocks called Church Hill, which were considered anathema  to anyone white or socially mobile.  It housed project after project, diversified only by dilapidated housing owned by slumlords.

In the past decade, however, Church Hill has become all the rage with hipsters and white Christians alike.  First, were the Christian pioneers.  They genuinely lived into the awkwardness of becoming racial minorities and sought to learn the Christian meaning of neighbor.  Their success has been a blessing and a curse to the neighborhood.  On the one hand, they committed to sending their kids to public schools, building non-profits, infrastructures, and a church, and living in homes that did not fit the dreams of their parents.

On the other hand, they started a trend.

And it has exploded.

And the ashes have fallen on the black, poor community.

Young, white people have moved into the area in droves, turning Church Hill into the Hottest Housing Market of 2016.  With them has not come the Cum-bah-yah dream of bettering a community.   Sure, business has boomed, money is pumping into the community and roadways are being fixed.  But the business are coffee shops and elite craft bars, the money is pumping into renovating homes for white people, and the roadways don’t matter for those who cannot purchase a vehicle in the first place.  With each new construction and clearing of an abandoned lot also comes a new price tag that the urban black community can no longer afford.

Yes, I have witnessed things that make suburbanites uncomfortable.  I know where the drug deals are happening. I can tell you where to get a prostitute. I fall asleep to sirens most nights and I wake up to loud drunken arguments of street-roamers at 3am.  But I can also walk to a restaurant and bar that charges 50 bucks for a date night meal and doesn’t have a single item on the menu that a poor or lower-middle class person would recognize.  And when I walk into that space, I can casually discuss social justice issues while sipping a $10 cocktail, and be surrounded by people who look like me and who demand nothing of me.  Then, I can walk home and sleep at night, feeling the warm fuzzies of my conversations about serious issues without actually sacrificing anything to address them.

The problem with the restoration of these types of neighborhoods is this:  The poor black community wasn’t invited to the party.  Talking about racial reconciliation comfortably over a vegan, gluten-free muffin and fair trade over-priced coffee in an area that used to be dangerous and used to be black is not exactly living out social change.  It is just making us feel better.

While most of us arrived in this community with good intentions, we neglected to change our patterns—of socializing, of shopping, of consuming food, and most importantly living out our values of security and privacy. We may have built our walls next to black underprivileged families but we are living vastly different lives simply because ours are intentional.  Yes, we have made a point to meet members of this neighborhood who are not like us, but it is always on our terms and when we choose to interact. If we shut our doors, no one is going to come into our home uninvited, needing a place to stay.  If our children struggle at school, we have the leverage to negotiate with teachers or choose a different school completely. If we have a weakness, it will not be broadcast across the neighborhood.  We did not stumble into anything. We chose each and every step, and at any point, we can choose to abandon ship.  We will never be equal as long as we have this privilege of choice.

No matter where your home dwells, are you living next to your neighbor or living with your neighbor? Until we sacrifice and can answer the latter, we will never know the fullness of community.

–Megan Cottam

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

You’re Not Listening

It was something so surreal that no one could take it seriously.  A man spewing hatred, inciting offense and ignoring all the rules of the political game slowly gained the votes needed to be elected as the Republican candidate for President of the United States.  As his delegate count increased, the shouts declaring him Hitler grew louder.  Comedians, mainstream politicians, talk show hosts, and anyone else who could grab a microphone decried what was happening. They spoke of bigotry, sexism, racism, unprofessionalism and attacked his character and credentials.  John Oliver even went so far as to discredit his name in the #neverdrumpf campaign.

But the votes for Donald Trump kept coming.

And, as much as we would like to believe that hyper-white-supremacist and uneducated citizens voted for this man, the reality is that his supporters are hiding in average America.  His supporters are not necessarily hateful.  They are not revolutionaries.  They are the un-phenomenal characters of the world whose vision of America, for good or for bad, has been discredited and ignored.

Frankly, it does not matter what Trump has to say. Trump has nothing original to tell us.  His flip flops, theatrics and sound-bytes are calculated devices meant to stir a suppressed population.  He is only a mirror reflecting the hidden thoughts of our country that have been censored by a politically correct code of conduct.

What does matter is what has been building below the surface.  We have fooled ourselves into thinking that we are a country that respects diversity, honors equality, and braves change for the betterment of others and the less fortunate.  We use the language that reflects these values, but we act out of values far more selfish.  Trump has made America take a hard look in the mirror.  We love ourselves far more than our neighbor, security far more than compassion, and money far more than our health and environment.

The Democratic response to the rise of Trump is also important to note.  The utter shock and dismay at the Republican candidacy is part of the problem.   Democrats and dissenting independents are truly shocked at the support of Trump’s values because, as high-tech Americans, we never need to listen honestly to opposing views.  We know very little about the opposition other than that we hate them and call them ignorant. Just yesterday, Hilary Clinton’s response to a tweet from Donald Trump simply said “DELETE YOUR ACCOUNT.”  There was no communication, just the idea that there was no need to listen to anything Trump had to say.

Or take, for example, the U.S. Supreme Court decision to allow for same-sex marriage.  The internet exploded in rainbows. Twitter erupted with #lovewins, Facebook changed profile pictures with multi-colored backgrounds, and even the White House used a rainbow floodlight.  The opposing viewpoint became bigots overnight, and their voices were drowned out by the crowds calling them idiots, uneducated, hateful, and the like.  There was no educated conversation or respectful debate. There was no civility.  There was no room to listen to the opposition.  Ironically, the pro-tolerant #lovewins campaign was extremely intolerant of dissenting views.

How can we get away with not even conversing on issues anymore? Our news apps and social media do the work for us.  They allow us to filter the news we want to see.  When we do not like what someone else has to say, we can block or unfriend them.  We believe simultaneously in the right to say and believe whatever we want while not allowing others the ability to believe anything different from us.  We have become our own omnipotent gods, sure in ourselves and unwilling to seek input from outside sources.

However, we cannot ignore opposition forever.   What happens when we ignore and discredit entire communities? They find ways of seeking power, one way or another.  On the streets, power is found in guns, inciting fear, and violence.  In the #blacklivesmatter campaign, power is found with riots, protests, and blockades.  In the Trump campaign, power is found in crassness, and old-fashioned discrimination.

We can give power to others when we listen to them, validate their narratives and emotions, and then move to some common ground.  If we choose to ignore others, label them uneducated or “crazy,” and discount them, they will find an alternative way to that power.

We cannot close our eyes and wish away a Trump Presidency.  For many years, this is how we have treated opinions we oppose.  We drew our social circles in such a way that we never needed to see the “ugly” reality of the other side.  But whether we admit it or not, the other side remains, and they are seeking to be heard.  It is our choice whether we can address one another’s differences with love, or with continued hatred and polarization.

–Megan Cottam

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Mindsets of Mercy: Pt 2

Mindset Number Two: You cannot earn mercy, or require others to earn it.

On the popular ABC show, Modern Family, the character Phil wants deeply to be there for his family.  He is a bit of a goofball, but warm-hearted and well-intentioned.  One of his weaknesses is a fear of clowns.  On one recent episode, Phil is forced to face his fears when a child’s birthday party is floundering, due to a missing entertainment act.  Phil decides to play the role of the clown in order to save the day.  He begins well, until he looks into a mirror and sees a clown staring back.  He immediately faints, embarrasses the family, and causes quite a public scene.

For the rest of the episode, Phil attempts to earn back his ability to help and support the family.  First he tries to fix a computer and fries it.  Next, he fixes a leak and causes a flood instead.  Everything he touch breaks.  His family begs him to stop trying.

This is how we can be.  We do something wrong, and assume we need to make up for it. If we could just do this one great thing, we can be forgiven.

My husband has tried this method when seeking forgiveness.  A foreigner to the kitchen, he will decide to make me a meal.  What begins as “dinner will be ready in 30 minutes” ends with a two-hour wait, smoke alarm going off, burnt dinner and destroyed kitchen.   Sometimes, attempting to earn things causes greater loss.  We need to learn the lesson that Phil’s family was begging him to understand: Stop trying to earn it.  Sometimes, we must walk away, say, I need your forgiveness, and just sit in our human condition.  We are not beings who can make everything better and erase all of our mistakes.  We should try not to repeat the same mistake, but we cannot make ourselves worthy of mercy with other tasks and things.

Mercy and forgiveness aren’t quantifiable.  We cannot say to one another, “If you do these five things perfectly, you receive my mercy. Otherwise, you are anathema.” It either exists as part of a culture or it doesn’t.  You do not get it when you are worthy.  If we were worthy of mercy, it would be called justice. They are not the same thing.

In the Old Testament, humans had to earn God’s forgiveness by offering sacrifices to the temple.  They brought unblemished animals of varying size depending on their sins.  Did that get the people in line?  Did they go and sin no more? Humans fell anyway, and continue to fall.  Humanity did not work well with conditional forgiveness.  God created unconditional love, and a permanent way back to Him in Divine Mercy.  Jesus is our sacrificial Lamb who atones for sins, permanently. And that’s why it works. We don’t earn it. We just need to want it.

Just as God does not make us jump through hoops for His mercy, we can’t make people grovel for ours. . We see this played out in the Parable of the Unforgiving Servant (Matthew 18:26-28).  We cannot seek constant mercy to God, and then turn around and deny it to our brothers and sisters. When faced with the need to gift mercy to others, we need to remember the un-earned mercy given to us first.

–Megan Cottam

Posted in Uncategorized | Leave a comment